Kirov! part 3: Kirovs in Soviet/Russian service

Pyotr Velikiy.

The collapse of the USSR had a major impact on the Kirov program. By the time the lead ship Kirov was put into commission, it was 1980,  and the enormous military spending of the USSR (50% of GDP) was bringing the rest of the economy to a halt. As a result, I'm breaking up the service records into three eras: the Soviet era, the 1990s shambles, and the 2000 + stabilization of Russia.

As a preamble, I thought I'd mention something only occasionally touched on when talking about the Soviet Military: the corrosive nature of their military-industrial complex. Jobs producing military goods were higher status in the Soviet Union, as well as relatively well paying. While there were lots of other things driving Soviet military budgets (especially in the early 1980s, when the Cold War reached a peak of hostility) communist party officials could best bring home the bacon for their constituents by getting more military production in their district. I suspect that some of the push for larger surface fleets was connected with this drive.

I mention this as while the Soviet Naval strategy was one of interdiction with submarines and long range aircraft, at some point after 1970 there seems to be a push for a much broader surface fleet. Why this was a push is a bit vague to me, except that the Soviets wanted to have a navy that like the vast American carrier fleet could project power globally. Given how much money the Soviets sank (heh) into submarines, it should have been clear even to Soviet military planners that such a fleet might have been beyond the USSR's economic abilities. The Kirovs were going to be the nuclear powered goons of such a surface fleet: capable of projecting power on their own in the short term, and later as capable escorts for hypothetical Soviet supercarriers. As it happened, the Kirovs were as far as the plan went.

Anyway I mention all this as a serious history issue that I really don't have a handle on, but one that still animates the Russian Navy today. While Russian Navy strategy has a whole other set of problems to deal with, there still seems to be some subset in the Russian Navy that thinks 'proving Russia is a great power' via 'big projects to challenge the might of the US Navy' is still a good idea.

Kirov in 1983 - she has the dual rear cannons and a different aft radar mast.

Back in the USSR

The Kirov [pennant number: 059] launched in 1977 and was commissioned in 1980, and by that time, had made quite an impression. The United States had taken the step of recommissioning their Iowa-class battleships to counter the new battle cruisers. (So in a way, the Kirov class paved the way for such movies as Under Siege, and Battleship, as well as that one video Cher made in the 1980s on the deck of the New Jersey.) The new battle cruiser naturally became the flagship of the Soviet northern fleet (IE the one based out of Murmansk and Archangel. ) The ship was anything but bug free, initially - making all those sub-systems play nice with each other must have been a bit nightmarish - but soon Kirov was functioning well enough to go to work. An early assignment in 1983 was to keep an eye on American fleet assets during the American involvement in Lebanon's civil war. Kirov also had to defend herself in a bizarre incident in Severomorsk, the closed city that was home port of the Northern Fleet. A fire started in a munitions warehouse that began setting off the many tons of explosives and missiles that were stored there. Kirov, in port at the time, activated her point-defense systems just to protect herself from the hot projectiles being set off by the conflagration.

In 1981, the second Kirov class was launched, and by fall 1984 was in commission. The Frunze [pennant number 050] naturally became the flagship of the Pacific fleet, based out of Vladivostok. During her voyage to the Pacific Frunze made goodwill visits to friendly nations, and was politely probed by western navies.

The Fruzne. I suspect this photo is at least late 1980s from the stains on her hull.

 Meanwhile, the next Kirov-class hull had been completed - but it was not to become a battlecruiser. The SSV-33 'Ural' [pennant number CCB-33] had a much more ambitious course to chart. Many United States Missile ranges - including, eventually, the ones hosting the 1980s era anti-ballistic missile program - were located on islands in the South Pacific. On the eastern Seaboard, Cuba was conveniently placed to snoop on space activities, but in the Southern Pacific the Soviets had nothing. So, a plan was hatched in the 1970s to build the mother of all intelligence ships: the project was soon christened Titan. It would be nuclear powered - both for the long on-station endurance and to provide power the staggering array of sensors and computers the ship would need. It was equipped with two state of the art computer systems: one to interpret data from the Ural's sensor arrays, and another for signals processing. (Given the time frame I'm thinking both these computer systems were Soviet 1970s IBM mainframe equivalents, though some describe them as a Soviet attempt at supercomputers. They were big, hefty machines, to be sure. )  It would have a crew of 1000, and in essence had an entire apartment block's worth of space built atop the Kirov-class hull. (Apparently only the head of the Baltic Shipyard in Leningrad could navigate Ural's maze-like corridors without getting lost.) As the ship was pictured as being on station in international waters for extended lengths of time, the crew was given luxuries like swimming pools, a movie theater, and saunas to make the Ural more comfortable for the scientists and technicians. The main sensor array at the front of the ship had an exceptionally demanding job: it had to accurately monitor objects that might only be a meter across at trans-Pacific distances. In order to get sensor fidelity, it used power: peak signal strength was 5 Megawatts (MW). {Edit: see (1) at bottom.} You can see why the Soviets called this project Titan.

The Titian's main sensor. I think those blue tubes are just for cooling.

Also: not small.

 The engineer in charge of the project calculated initially the Soviets would need a ship 400 m (1312 ft!) long, but the project settled for a nuclear battlecruiser hull. The hull was based on the Kirov class design, but would have several differences. First, it was modestly larger: the rear sluce doors of the drydock she was constructed in were replaced with outward curving doors to get a little more space. Ural's power plant was also different: it used the OK-900, a two-core power plant developed for the Arktika class of nuclear icebreakers. It used highly enriched Uranium (55-90%) to produce 171 MW of power per core, for a total output of 342 MW. {Edit: see (2) at bottom.} This was buffered with two conventional power plants on either side of the reactor. The hull was launched in 1983.

By the time Kalinin [pennant number: 183, later 080] was commissioned in 1989, things had changed greatly in the USSR. Mikel Gorbachev had begun trying to reform the USSR, and as part of this, began talking peace and arms reduction with a surprisingly receptive President Reagan. Soviet cruisers were as likely to visit foreign ports as part of goodwill tours as shadow NATO fleet movements. While relations were improving, the USSR was increasingly septic, and some of this appears to have leaked into the Kirov program.

Kirov had begun to have serious problems with her nuclear power plant. [Note: all of this comes from the Hungarian source, so take it with a pinch of salt.] The loss of K-219 in 1986 (the SSBN that sank far off the eastern Atlantic seaboard ) and the later loss of K-278 in 1989 had resulted in overspeeding from the Kirov, as presumably she tried to get on site as rapidly as possible. First, (possibly in 1986) she managed to frag her transmission to the left propeller shaft. This was fixed, though in doing so, many awkward holes had to be cut around Kirov's reactor spaces and all the plumbing that entails. In the process of trying to fix either the holes or the transmission, some damage was done to the reactor systems itself,  causing a release of radioactive steam and fluid. Either the repair to the reactor was done half-assedly, or more damage was done to the reactor in question than realized, as in 1990, when Kirov cruising in the Mediterranean, a much more serious reactor accident happened. While details are a bit lacking, the result was a partial or total meltdown of one of her reactors. While the reactor was 'contained' at the scene, the Kirov returned to port, never to leave again. This accident marks the end of Kirov's active career. 

Meanwhile, the Ural, after many years of effort, had finally been commissioned. The process had been anything but smooth. The main problem after she was launched was her reactors. The Hungarian source talks about this and my understanding of what the problem was is low. Best I can make out is in 1987 serious flaws were discovered in the reactor's emergency shutdown systems, and then during power tests it was discovered that one of Ural's reactor cores emitted far more radiation than she should. (The scale here is a interesting question, since a normal amount of radiation in the west would be literally zero.) At any rate, it was decided to first remove the reactor's fuel, and then rip out the entire reactor core by cutting a massive hole in the ship's side. This operation was done - funny story - in the middle of Leningrad, the Soviet Union's second city, as that's where the Baltic shipyard was. The core replacement was then done, and by 1989, the Ural was complete. 

Unfortunately for the Ural, she was destined to become a poster child for failure in the Soviet Union. Squaring the complexity of the Kirov class turns out to be a terrible idea in that the resulting system is so complex you can't get it to work properly. The fact that many systems were custom-built for the Ural likely didn't help.The computer systems were still not working properly when the Ural made her maiden voyage to the Pacific. The Ural, like the Frunze before her, stopped off in a Vietnamese port for a goodwill visit. Soviet security personnel were armed with not only rifles, but grenade launchers to protect the giant intelligence ship. One night the Security detail ended up grenading a suspicious craft that they had discovered near the Ural. This craft turned out to be a sea turtle.

When the Ural arrived at Vladivostok, it was discovered that she was too big to dock in existing port facilities - her pier had not been built yet. Ural remained anchored in the harbor, while her crew tried to get the bugs out of the ship's systems so she could start collecting intel. Other problems cropped up around this time; Ural's reactors developed further problems, this time with their cooling system. OK-900 was clearly a sarcastic name. In 1990 the Ural, still not working, caught fire several times, compounding the fuckery that would have to be undone before sailing to the south Pacific. She also one night during a storm broke anchor and drifted out to sea, coming within a ship's length of crashing onto nearby rocks. She also was nearby when a naval ammo store caught fire and exploded, sending missiles everywhere. While her luck suggests that she take 15-20 missile hits, she managed to dodge the sorta-metaphorical bullet that time.

Add caption

Frunze meanwhile served without incident in the Pacific fleet. Kalinin, more advanced than the previous two Kirovs, appears to have been functional from her commissioning time till the fall of the USSR, and even won "best rocket shooter" in the Northern fleet. Even before the fall of the Soviet Union, there was pressure to limit the use of the remaining Kirovs for sort of once again vague reasons having to do with their reactors. Either they didn't refuel easily, or the reactors were not well built in the first place, and the Soviets didn't want them wearing out prematurely and then having to replace them?

A Bear Dies in the Woods

When the wreckage was finally extinguished after the Soviet collapse, Russia and the former USSR republics faced a similar economic situation: there was too little of everything except now unwanted military gear. The Russian Navy for the next decade struggled to keep itself basically functional, sometimes having so little money it couldn't pay its sailors. Even the once all important SSBN deterrence patrols were neglected in a effort to keep the lights on. This was made even more difficult thanks to decisions made by the Soviet Union in the fat days. The USSR often didn't consider what something would in fact cost to run; they often built ships and submarines as a cost-no-object enterprise. The Russian Navy put a lot of effort into developing new SSBN submarines because of this: the Delta class was a old design, and the Typhoon class was enormously expensive to run, making maintaining deterrence even more expensive for the Russian Navy. Surface ship construction for all intents and purposes stopped. Construction continued in conventional and nuclear attack submarines, with a few Akula class SSNs and some Kilo class conventional submarines being made. The Russians actually had a commercial succsess with the Kilo class, building many for other nations, especially China.

Admiral Nakhimov in storage.

What this meant for big capital ships like the Kirovs was that there was no replacement for them in the planning horizon. The Russian navy valued their unique battlecruisers enormously, but now had to face heavy budget pressures. The Russian Navy wanted to fix Admiral Ushakov (ex-Kirov) but now had no money to do it. The Kalinin became the Admiral Nakhimov, which rarely sailed anywhere. By 1999 Nakhimov was in need of a refit, and was put into storage, likely more carefully than Ushakov. The Frunze was renamed Admiral Lazarev, and like the Nakhimov was likely used gently. In 1999, when the Nakhimov was put into storage, Lazarev too was in need of a refit. Unfortunately, such a refit was deemed too expensive, and the decision was made to deactivate Lazarev instead.

It was still better than what happened to the Ural. The Ural spent the 90s at anchor in Vladivostok. Her complexity required enormous amounts of regular maintenance, and that just didn't happen post-Soviet breakup. As a result the ship ended up as a floating barracks, with about 100 luckless officers and men trying to keep the sea rot at bay.  At some point, Ural developed a 5 degree list that was never corrected. In essence, while the ship was originally destined for the South Pacific, it ended up in Siberia, forgotten.

At some point a storm wrecked the main array's weather shelter.

The only bright spot in all of this is the completion of Pyotr Velikiy (ex-Yuri Andropov, pennant numbers  099.)  Laid down in 1986, she was only launched in 1996, and was commissioned in 1998. She became the flagship of the Northern Fleet after acceptance trials. In terms of systems, she is very close to Admiral Nakhimov as completed - the main visual difference is that Pyotr Velikiy has a new radar system above her bridge. Pyotr Velikiy's career has been mostly without drama, though as the flagship she has made many goodwill tours, and in recent years has participated in joint naval exercises with other nations. Pyotr Velikiy is also usually in attendance when the Russians wish to make a show of force - the aircraft carrier Kuznetsov's recent Syrian trip saw Pyotr Velikiy in escort.

In between angry tweets, the RN managed to keep photobombing
Pyotr Velikiy as she sailed through the British channel.

In 2000, Pyotr Velikiy was there at the first post-Soviet Russian fleet exercises, which saw the loss of the Kursk Oscar class submarine. Pyotr Velikiy was at the time playing the "hostile" ship when the accident occurred. In 2004, Pyotr Velikiy was visited by a ghost of Kirov past when Admiral Vladimir Kuroyedov declared Pyotr Velikiy unfit for service thanks to shoddy maintenance of her reactors. Pyotr Velikiy was then docked and her crew denied 1/3rd pay - Wikipedia notes that this incident happened due to "internal politics", but this does not deny the possibly that the internal politics were the Admiral not wanting to see the pride of the Russian fleet frag her reactors - again.

The Last Battlecruiser

Even Winter Ends

The economic thaw in the early 2000s in Russia left the Russian Navy with some surprisingly common problems: namely, what kinds of capacity did its Navy need, and how best to go about getting it? While it had retained its submarine building capacity, its surface fleet capacity had withered away entirely. While this wasn't much of a problem when there were plenty of Soviet-era hulls to burn through, the Russians began thinking about about building modern corvettes, frigates and destroyers, with modern (as opposed to extravagant Soviet) running costs. Regenerating its capacity to build those sorts of ships has been a goal of the Russian navy the past 15 or so years, one that is now showing signs of success.

Soviet ships, meanwhile, stay around if they offer unique capacities not to be replaced anytime soon. The Kirov class, the Slava-class cruisers, what aircraft carriers the Soviets left, and a few classes of Soviet-vintage submarine are still used in the modern Russian fleet.

This does not include the Ural. She was decommissioned in 2001, (and at some point literally welded to a dock), and had her reactor's fuel removed in 2009, having only used about 30% of it. It seems in 2017 Ural, the Titan-that-was, will be brought to a Russian shipyard to be finally scrapped.

The tragic thing is that it never appeared in Half-Life 2: Episode 3.

 While Pytor Velikiy remains the pride of the fleet, the Russian Navy has shown a lot of interest in recommissioning its remaining Kirov-class battle cruisers. While they would talk about getting Ushakov back into commission past 2010, her reactor damage argued against this. There were additional factors arguing against recommissioning: when she was deactivated, it is uncertain how much work was put into putting her in mothballs. I'm guessing the work was not great enough to keep her sprawling electronic systems from degrading. The other factor arguing against refurbishing Ushakov is that her sister ships were likely kept running with a supply of Ushakov's parts. In 1999, the Russian Navy started an overhaul on Ushakov, but in 2001 gave it up as a bad job. Ushakov was not scrapped but remained, when in the post Ukrainian invasion interest was once again shown in getting all four battle cruisers back into commission. In 2012 even the Russian Navy admitted Ushakov was beyond repair. As of this writing (4/9/2017) Ushakov is laid up, scheduled to be scrapped.

Lazerev, despite her longer service life, is also apparently a hopeless case. It's likely that she was not put into storage properly, and she was already in need of a refit even before she was put into mothballs. In 2002, she suffered a major fire, doing who-knows-what damage. Also, stuff is apparently not so good in her reactor spaces - they were actually sealed in 2005 due to, well, I assume stuff leaking and seeping that is extremely dangerous, so I assume the reactor is a complete tear-down. Russian media, especially in the post-Ukrainian invasion, is still eager to cheer Lazerev's recommissioning, but I expect building a new battlecrusier would be a cheaper/easier solution.

Nakhimov, in contrast, could still return to service. When put into storage, it was in by far the best condition of the Soviet-era battlecruisers, and spent only a little time deactivated. Seven years after being mothballed, it was decided by the Russian Navy to bring Nakhimov out of storage and complete her refit. It seems that this was ongoing between 2006-2012, when the Navy decided that Nakhimov's refit should include the latest missiles, including the P.800 Oniks [NATO: SS-N-26 Strobile] which is a ramjet powered "universal" cruise missile modeled on the SS-N-19 Shipwreck, but able to be launched from ship, submarine, or airplane. If true, that means Nakhimov will really live up to the battlecruiser name, being able to fit 60 missiles where it kept its 20 Shipwrecks.  The refit should be complete 'in the late 2010s' when Nakhimov would become the flagship of the Pacific fleet.

Conclusion

So I've written this thing, and while I have no opinion about who would win in a fight in 1989 the Admiral Nakimov or the New Jersey, or any sort of opinion on swarms of missiles vs. a US carrier group, it's helped me come to one or two conclusions about the Kirovs.

First, aside from sometimes crap nuclear reactors (!) it seems to me that the Kirovs are in fact a good design, and one that furthermore was a smart addition to the Soviet naval arsenal, in that it synergized with existing strengths. Unlike the woeful Ural, all the sensors, weapons, and defensive weapons had already been developed for other Soviet Naval projects. What's more, missiles were a definite strength of the USSR, so building a big platform that utilized those was another smart synergestic move.The result was a warship that is better than any other surface ship at protecting itself and attacking in a modern naval environment. What's more, it's main offensive weapon is likely to be spectacularly lethal to anything less than something as well defended as a US Navy carrier group.

The nuclear power, though, turned out to be a dead end. The Russians learned what the Americans did: that the cost only makes sense if nuclear power gives you something that is worth that cost. With surface ships, the only nuclear powered vessels are the US Navy's supercarriers, which are such large ships that the energy density of nuclear power makes for large cost savings. (A carrier group has to be followed around by fleet oilers to deliver fuel to conventional escorts and the aircraft the group operates. Not having to refuel the largest military ships in commission simplifies this greatly.) You only get the infinite mobility of nuclear power if all the ships in your formation are nuclear powered; and that proved too expensive for the United States.

Making the battlecrusiers nuclear powered turned out to be one of those decisions that would be a millstone for the Soviet and Russian Navies to haul around. It make the ships much more expensive, and managed to break in terrifyingly expensive ways, right at the time the USSR was bankrupt. It's possible that all four ships might still be in commission if they were powered conventionally.

The remaining Kirov-classes are something of a prestige project for the modern Russian Navy - but one that is understandable, and useful for a few reasons. First, the Kirovs still show the flag and project force, and unlike, say, the Admiral Kuznetsov, do so quite credibly. They also retain their impressive capabilities - as sub-systems and missiles get swapped out for newer, more capable systems. The modular nature of their main offensive and defensive systems is something that an old fashioned battleship could only dream about. The prestige aspect is understandable too: if there's one thing to take away from the Kirov story, it's what a miserable time the past 30 or so years have been for the Soviet/Russian Navy. The Kirovs are a rare bright spot, and even then half the Kirovs completed were lost through lack of funds and incompetence with nuclear technology. So the Russian desire to hold onto the remaining two battlecruisers is natural. After all, the Kirov program did give the Soviets/Russians one thing they can be justly proud of: the world's only large surface combatant warships, capable of surviving and fighting in a modern combat environment.

Part 1

Part 2

Edits: (1) The stray emissions from the main sensor were enough to kill all rats aboard the Ural, and the Ural remained rat-free when the main array was in operation.  After talking with someone who understands the science better than I, I think this claim does not make sense. If the Ural was rat free, there was some other reason.

(2)While it is a bit fuzzy to me, the Ural seems to have been straight nuclear - IE it was powered just by its reactors, and didn't have a conventional main power plant. This would make sense as weight and space still seems to have been something of an issue.  The internet has shown me a picture of of the Ural underway with smoke billowing from what is evidently a ship's funnel/radar mast so scratch that. 

Kirov! 2: More Options than a Mercedes S-class

Pyotr Velikiy (Peter the Great.)

Battleships were over by the time the Second World War ended. Aside from the US Navy (who being a superpower could afford to be sentimental about massively expensive warships) what battleships remained at the end of World War 2 were decommissioned and scrapped with astonishing rapidity, considering in World War 2 the very same ships were thought of as critical strategic assets.

Why battleships fell completely out of favor is a pretty simple story. Battleships were enormously expensive to build and to man, and the march of technology had made them very vulnerable – both to submarines and to aircraft. The development of the first guided munitions in World War 2 was a knock against them, as going forward it would be far easier to design weapons with enough explosive to negate a battleship's armor. Another factor was that aircraft carriers had proven themselves as capable of taking over their role of defeating enemy warships at vastly greater engagement ranges than battleships were capable of. This was convenient, as World War 2 was a series of sharp lessons about the necessity of air cover for warships, so even if the former was not true, carriers were now seen as indispensable for large scale operations. The carrier had another advantage as well: when it went into battle, it risked damage to its aircraft, not necessary itself. This was important, as World War 2 (from the perspective of battleships) was a long series of lessons on how minor damage on battleships could lead to not so minor downtimes. Every time your battleship did what it was built to do (IE engage enemy warships) there was a chance it'd take damage that might see it sidelined in a naval yard six months or more. This sidelining could happen thanks to submarines, mines, and aircraft as well. America got around this via its incredible floating portable dry-docks, but every other battleship-possessing nation was pretty much hosed. This vulnerability had another disadvantage: it made the use of battleships very conservative. Both Italy and Japan managed to end the war still possessing battleships, even as the rest of their fleet had been sank.

So when the Soviets began building battlecrusiers in the 1970s, you bet they'd had a think about this. The solution was technology: the Kirovs use the latest in missile technology for offensive actions, and a bewildering array of similar technology to defend themselves against missiles, aircraft, and submarines. Each offensive and defensive technology also seems to have its own bespoke sensor system, so a Kirov is a nest of sensors, detectors, and automatic turrets for hucking stuff at incoming ordinance. At the same time, its offensive weapons are the cleverest, deadliest missilery Soviet/Russian science can cook up, which is considerable.

Congratulations on buying a RUSSIA STRONK Kirov-class battlecruiser!

If taken care of properly, your RUSSIA STRONK Kirov-class battlecruiser can last many decades with an occasional overhaul. Please peruse this document for vital ownership and warranty information.

MY KIROV CLASS BATTLECRUSIER IS NAMED: __________________________________

Basic Stats

Ship type: Battlecruiser

Length: 252 m (827 ft)

Beam: 28 m (94 ft)

Displacement: 28,000 tons fully armed and loaded

Complement: < 600 - > 800 depending on vessel and era. This includes aircrew and staff for helicopters and a command staff for flag officers.

Power plant: hybrid nuclear/conventional turbine steam power, with nuclear as primary and conventional steam as a backup. 2 KN-3 reactors with an output of 300 MW each, two steam power generators of 14,000 hp each, combined output of 100,000 kW (140,000 shaft horsepower.)

Range: unlimited

Endurance based on food stores: 60 days

Fuel (nuclear reactors): Uranium 50% enriched. Note: for refueling, only buy RUSSIA STRONK brand fuel rods for your Kirov-class battlecruiser (in the red and gold package.) It has been specially formulated for your Kirov-class's reactors. Only use uranium fuel rods with a 50% enrichment; rods beneath this enrichment level will sap performance and fuel life, while rods over 50% could damage your ship's reactors and invalidate your warranty.

Conventional plant: Russian standard bunker-grade fuel oil. [UPDATE 2016: it has come to RUSSIA STRONK's attention that some users of our warships have been supplanting their fuel supply with additives in an attempt to economize. These additives include shredded tires, shredded low-grade consumer plastics, and coal-tar slurry. These additives can not only damage your steam turbines and invalidate your warranty, the combustion products are frequently known carcinogens and are against most nations' environmental laws. If a economy grade fuel oil is desired, please stick to Carnival Cruise Lines “International Waters and Third World Nations” bunker grade guidelines.]

RUSSIA STRONK will not name names.

Also in your package should be:

warranty card;

Please only buy RUSSIA STRONK brand marine anti-fouling paint; substitutions may be more noticeable than you think.

This handy wall poster of the family tree of the S-300 series SAM:

Project documentation in paper binders and  5x PC-CDROM; (Windows 98SE or better required);

“Calibrating your CWIS” instructional pamphlet;

A starter pack of three Kamov 27 “Helix” anti-submarine helicopters. [Note: ASW torpedoes and acoustic buoys sold separately.][Note 2: PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO GET THE “HELIX” HELICOPTERS OUT OF THEIR BLISTER PACKS CORRECTLY. The dual rotor mechanism is easily damaged;]

Note that the hanger space of your Kirov class battlecrusier was designed to only work with RUSSIA STRONK brand Kamov 27s. Other types of helicopters will not work, no matter what the British tell you.

Munitions

A blister pack containing a BONUS - a complete load of missiles and ammunition.

The Kirov class battlecruiser went though significant sub-system revision between the earlier Kirov and  Frunze, and the later Kalinin and  Andropov. The blister packs come in “early” and “late” varieties, but your ship may have some other combination of equipment.

Early blister pack contains:

20 x Granit [NATO: SS-N-19 'Shipwreck']anti-ship missiles;

96 x S-300F long range [NATO: SA-N-6 'Grumble'] SAMs;

40 OSA-MA point defense [NATO: SA-N-4 'Gecko'] SAMs;

2x 100mm L60 auto-loading cannon ammunition;

Anti-torpedo rocket system: 3x launchers 1x 10 barrel, 2x six barrel, 40-60 reloads;

10x 533mm torpedo tubes, box o' type 53 torpedoes;

Metel Anti-ship complex with 40x UDAV-1 [NATO: SS-N-14 'Silex'] anti-submarine missiles.

Please only load missiles in their proper packaging. Attempting to load 'open' missiles often damages delicate control surfaces.

Later blister pack contains:

20 x Granit [NATO: SS-N-19 'Shipwreck'] anti-ship missiles;

48 x S-300F [NATO: SA-N-6 'Grumble'] and 48 x S-300FM [NATO: SA-N-20 'Gargoyle'] long range SAMs;

128 9K95 Tor point defense [NATO: SA-N-9 'Gauntlet'] SAMs;

60x 9M311 Kortik [NATO: SA-N-11 'Grison'] SAMs;

1x two barrel 130mm L70 dual purpose auto-loading cannon with ammunition;



CWIS: 8x Kashtan (Chestnut) semi-autonomous gun-missile point defense systems;

Anti-torpedo rockets: 3x launchers, 1 ten barrel, 2 six barrel, 40-60 reloads;

10x 533mm torpedo tubes, mixed box of type 53 torpedoes; and RPK-2 [NATO: SS-N-15 'Starfish'] anti-submarine missile.

 A coupon for 4 free 500 kT nuclear warheads, fixable to most surface to surface missiles. [The UN was insistent that we package these separately from our ships. Redeem at participating retailers or our website (contact info #9-84).]

NEW! Admiral Nakhimov (ex- Kalinin) is currently undergoing a refit, and is rumored to be getting a whole new blister pack of missiles and sub-systems! Your Kirov-class battlecruiser may be upgradable to these new systems for a modest fee! Please check the RUSSIA STRONK website for more details!

Sensors

Radar: Yes, various, see documentation

Fire control: As every system has its own fire control system, please see documentation

Sonar: Sonar mount in the bow, stern hatch can deploy sonar towfish and passive sonar nets.

ELINT: Yes, please see documentation

Jamming and countermeasures:  Yes, please see documentation

A series of books about the battlecruiser Kirov and its time-travelling adventures: yes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While that is obviously a whole shitload of weapons and subsystems, it gets even more daunting if you consider that the age of these systems may stretch from modern times to Soviet style electronics from the early 1980s. I imagine the electrotech engineers who maintain a  Kirov class battlecruiser are very good at their jobs.

Point defense systems are obviously a big part of how warships defend themselves against missiles, and the Kirov-class does not skimp on these. The initial two class vessels used eight AK-630-series 30mm 6 barrel Gatling gun pods.

We won't lie: basically stationary Daleks.

These pods are the big visual difference between the earlier and later vessels.

You can see the little angry daleks on those platforms on either side of the main missile deck. The large rectangular block of missile hatches center photo are for the SS-N-20s; the square hatches forward of those are for the SA-N-6/20 SAMs.

The Kirovs currently in commission mount the much more metal "chestnut" point defense systems. Twin 30mm Gatling guns and a smattering of point defense SAMs in one handy turret. The west has no equivalent, but imagine twin Avenger Gatling guns firing point defense "Hatredfarmer" SAMs in a turret that looks like a robot's head and you get the picture.

Please do not use the Chestnut's very high power microwave targeting radar to explode passing seabirds.

SS-N-19 Shipwreck – uh, YEAH that's a GI Joe reference

There is one munition that's worth going into some detail: the SS-N-19 'Shipwreck' missile, which is the main offensive weapon of the Kirovs. The Shipwreck is a cruise missile, 10 m long and about a meter wide, that launches itself via a rocket booster, and then once up to speed propels itself via ramjet (though some sources say turbojet). Range is believed to be 450 km/650 km @ mach 1.6.(high altitude mach 2.5.) The warhead has a few options: explosive (750 kg-1653 lbs), fuel-air explosive, or nuclear. Targeting can be done via the Kirov class's sensors, or a third party like a Tu-142 Bear, or by satellite. When it comes to blitzing a well-defended naval target, the Shipwreck is rumored to have a few interesting features.

Granit combustion products are not clean; after firing a salvo, your Kirov-class battlecruiser will need to be washed.

First, Shipwrecks were designed to fly in 'pods' of up to five missiles, with one missile flying higher than the others, acting as the 'eyes' for the pod. If the spotter missile is shot down, the pod replaces it. If the Shipwreck cruise missiles have their own onboard sensors, and can co-ordinate terminal guidance among themselves if necessary, and can also target sources of jamming. They can also decide among themselves what a high priority target is in the naval formation, and who should explode  what. The Russians have of course been trying to develop better versions of the Shipwreck, in one case with India. This has resulted in the P.800 Oniks as a replacement. Thanks to their large size, Shipwrecks can only be mounted on Kirov-class battlecruisers, Oscar class submarines, and the Kuznetsov carrier, which is probably a majority of the Kuznetsov's military utility, right there.

A Shipwreck ready to launch.

Shipwreck posed as it is in flight minus the parrot.

This is a cutaway of the turbojet version. The blue is the sensor package, the red is the warhead.

Once again: not small.

Just guessing here, but I'd say that the case of "swarms of shipwrecks vs. a USN carrier group's combined air defenses"is the Fuda Gap of naval warfare: studied exhaustively by both sides.

Part 1

Part 3 

Kirov! 1: Origin of Soviet Nuclear Battlecruisers

Note: this infodump is quick and dirty, mostly just me rattling around the internet.  I have two sources for this infodump: a Osprey book on Soviet Battlecrusiers, and this extensive, very interesting series of posts on the Kirov-class auto-translated from Hungarian by Google Chrome. If the dog of truth is indeed menaced with the opportunity of being fucked, just holler at me.

The start of nuclear powered battlecruisers for the Soviets starts in a very familiar place for anybody familiar with the Cold War: the other side had 'em, therefore we need to close that gap!

The USS Enterprise, the missile cruiser USS Long Beach, and the cruiser USS Bainbridge were United States Navy experiments in nuclear powered warships. The Soviets looked at these ships and decided it was high time a nuclear powered warship of the people was built. While the Soviet Navy had been sketching designs for nuclear powered warships since the early 1950s, only one surface ship, the civilian icebreaker Lenin had been actually built. That the warship was to be a cruiser was perhaps inevitable. The Soviets were just starting to get interested in carrier aviation, but they had been experimenting with the construction of cruisers since the end of World War 2.

Stalin himself got things started. After the end of the Great Patriotic war, Stalin envisioned the Soviet surface fleet as interceptors of amphibious invasions from the British and the Americans. To that end, Stalin ordered the construction of cruisers and battlecruisers - somewhat old fashioned cruisers and battlecruisers. Both were designed along the armor and big guns approach that had been popular before World War 2. (And the HMS Vanguard, I guess.) The idea was that they could be defended by land based aircraft while defending the motherland. While I get the impression this was seen as a throwback by the Soviet Navy, Stalin had not-so-figuratively murdered half the generals and commanders of the Red Army before World War 2, so nobody was about to argue. The Sverdlov class cruiser was the result.

Sverdlov class.

Initial plans were to build 40 (!) of these cruisers to support a number of Stalingrad class battlecruisers. The plan didn't last long, though: the whole concept was scrapped, seemingly the moment the Soviet Navy confirmed Stalin was in fact dead in 1953. The Soviets ended completing 14 Sverdlov class cruisers, with most being scrapped in the 1980s. One survives as a museum ship, the Mikhail Kutuzov.

The next era was Admiral Kuznetsov's. Just reading his wikipedia article, it sounds like Kuznetsov deserved better than to be named after a carrier that even the New York Times cracks jokes about. Admiral Kuznetsov started World War 2 head of the Soviet Navy, and kept his post throughout World War 2 and beyond. Now, with Stalin dead and the struggle for power distracting the highest levels of Soviet Government,  Adm. Kuznetsov began a program of refitting Sverdlov class cruisers and the lone completed Stalingrad-class hull to launch long range missiles at land targets. A lot of money was spent at this point making missiles that could be adapted onto ships. This plan didn't land long either: 1955 saw Kuznetsov retired, having backed the wrong side in the struggle that saw Nikita Khrushchev made Party Secretary. It was Marshall Zhukov who cashiered Kuznetsov, officially for the loss of the battleship Novorossiysk. Actually, this is a weird story: the Novorossiysk was formerly Giulio Cesare, an Italian battleship commissioned just in time for the First World War. At the end of World War 2, Cesare was given to the USSR as war reparations. The Soviets used the renamed Novorossiysk as a training ship in the Black Sea. All was well until one night in October 1955, when Novorossiysk was at anchor just off of Sevastopol. There she tripped a German naval mine left over from World War 2. The mine was a bottom dwelling type that was attracted to anchors, and contained over a metric ton of explosives- when it detonated it all but ripped the bow off the Novorossiysk, and she sank, killing 508 Soviet sailors. A post disaster sweep of the harbor found many more "leftover" mines of this type. Despite this, there's a rumor that the explosion was the act of literally some disgruntled Italian frogmen, alumni of the famous X MAS Italian Naval Special Forces...this could just be natural Soviet paranoia/ass-covering by blaming the west at work, though.

Where was I? Right, Soviet Cruisers. Khrushchev would cancel the Sverdlov class program, and was not long in shutting down Kuznetsov's plans. Khrushchev decided that the only force with long range nuclear missiles would be the newly formed strategic rocket forces.  Khrushchev also decided that the Soviet Navy would focus on submarines and interdiction of NATO resupply in the event of war.

Soviet Naval Engineers had been messing about with the missiles and equipment left over from Kuznetsov's plans, and decided a cruiser with big, ship killing missiles would be an excellent idea. This set the mold for Soviet cruiser classes. At the same time, the Soviets became increasingly concerned about American Ballistic Missile Submarines. Anti-Submarine cruisers were deemed to be an excellent idea. Grozny class missile cruisers, originally envisioned as carrier-killing missile spammers, were given *missiles that launched anti-submarine torpedoes* and thus became potent antisubmarine ships, as well.

I'm not sure how you'd rate the aesthetics of Soviet cruisers:

Kynda and Kresta I class. Note the front and rear missile turrets actually rotate.

Kresta II class. The big square lego-brick-like missile tubes are where the "Metel" anti-sub missiles are kept that-drop-torpedoes or nuclear depth charges.

Kara class.

My take: some Soviet cruisers look alright; some look like deep-sea creatures that attract prey via lures.

1144 Hot Girls best Soviet design bureau

Project 1144

So: 1968. When the imperative came down for nuclear powered cruisers, the Soviets had two existing templates for cruisers: anti-ship missile cruisers, and anti-submarine cruisers. The design studies for nuclear cruisers saw possibly building both in a nuclear flavor. This was complected by Soviet navy doctrine, which when it came to surface ships tended to get muddled, as politics and technology changes in their adversary the US Navy would cause re-thinks. In essence, the mission that was settled on once Khrushchev had his say remained, and the sunk costs in cruisers dictated their deployment. In addition to the anti-submarine mission, Soviet cruisers could spam missiles at enemy ships, and failing that, show the flag and project force where the Soviets needed. In 1973 during the Yom Kippur War for example, the Kynda class cruiser Grozny shadowed the US Navy carrier Independence in order to ensure non-interference from American Naval units in that war.

An early design study; it looks really modern even today to me.

The Soviet nuclear cruisers found their designs combined when the design started to favor a large size. The Soviets wanted to have the missile tubes for the primary armament sunk into the deck rather than sitting in static tubes atop of it, in order to lower the ship's center of gravity. In order to get a sufficiently impressive number of the new SS-N-20 “Shipwreck” anti-ship missiles onto the hypothetical cruiser, it was going to require a lot of deck space. In order to defend the cruiser against aircraft and submarines required a lot more deck space, and so the result was a pretty big warship. The resulting vessel was a heavy cruiser/ battlecruiser, one that leveraged the Soviet's advantage in missiles and active defense technology. Such a ship could not only barrage-fire the USSR's latest, nastiest anti-ship missiles at American carriers, it could also defend itself and nearby naval units from air and missile attack. This was also a design that could project force across the world like a American carrier group, but could be deployed in short order, without having to compete with the United States in carrier construction.

There was a further reason for the project as well – to serve as a mobile command center. The Soviet surface fleet was somewhat unusual in that it didn't especially value the man on the spot – orders and movements were coordinated from Navy HQ. In 1970, a training exercise showed that this didn't work very well in practice. So the Soviet Navy became interested in command ships – not so much changing the command hierarchy as moving decision makers closer to the action where they could be more effective.

Nuclear power gave the Kirovs effectively unlimited range, obviously, but the Admiral in charge of the Soviet surface fleet, Admiral Gorshkov insisted that the Kirovs had a conventional steam generation plant as well. He seems to have been concerned with what would happen if the reactor failed: "What a shame it would be if the ship would remain standing in the open water because reaktorhiba!" Given later events, this concern seems justified. The split power plants means that a Kirov class battlecruiser can make 20 knots under nuclear power alone, or can break 30 knots using both powerplants. The Kirov class is classified as a "Heavy Missile Cruiser" by the Russians, but the term battle cruiser is usually used in the west. It's a distinction without much difference, but in the big gun/heavy metal era of warships, a battlecruiser was a ship that mounted a battleship's guns but lacked the battleship's armor, and thus was faster. A Kirov class's main weapon system can definitely kill even the largest naval ships, so it seems a fair name. It also describes how big the Kirov class is: close in size (though not displacement) to the battleships of the Second World War:

Scale drawings of various battleships, with a Kirov battlecruiser in the top left.

The lead ship, Kirov would take seven years to make in the Baltic shipyards of Leningrad – building a warship nearly the size of a Iowa class battleship obviously was something of a learning experience, especially as this warship relied on many sets of complex subsystems to attack and defend itself with.  Kirov was laid down in '74, launched in '77, and commissioned in 1980. The next ship, Frunze, was laid down in 1978, and commissioned in 1984.  Frunze also was redesigned with lessons learned from Kirov's construction, and features a few modifications. The later two ships in the class, Kalinin and Yuri Andropov were further evolutions of the design. Kalinin was laid down in 1983 and commissioned in 1988. Yuri Andropov's history is a bit more convoluted. Laid down in 1986 and launched in 1989, it only was commissioned in 1998 - and not with the name Yuri Andropov.

A fifth Kirov class, the Dzerzhinskiy, was laid down in 1989. It seems the worsening economic situation of the Soviet Union cancelled construction, and she was broken up in 1990. A modified Kirov class hull also served as the basis for the Ural, a mammoth intelligence ship. The Ural was launched in 1983, but only completed in 1989.

 By 1980, the USSR was dependent on grain imports from the United States, and the economic diseases of the Soviet Empire had reached metastasis. The decline and fall of the USSR would play a big role in the Kirov class's deployments and service life.

Part 2

Part 3

1/700 Kirov Class Battlecruiser

Finished a new model some time ago: the 1/700 Admiral Nakhimov from Dragon/Cyber Hobby.

It came out of a Cyber Hobby Orange box. For those that don't know, Orange Box is Dragon's bargain boxes: older molds sold cheaper, often with multiple kits/nice extras.  The Admiral Nakhimov is practically an action playset: in addition to the Nakhimov, the kit comes with a Los Angeles class submarine, Several Ka-27 helicopters, a S-3 Viking, a P-3 Orion, and a Seahawk helicopter. The kit itself is pretty good I think; the only place you feel like you are missing something is photo-etch for the antennas. PE also would have been good for the helicopter rotor blades. 

It's been a very long time since I built a ship, so I approached the whole thing as a learning experience. Getting the right color for the anti-fouling paint on the deck proved challenging - I think it is a blend of three different colors - and masking the helicopter deck took a few tries. But the future coats, and the dullcoat at the end helped blend the colors. 

I want to make a sea base for the Nakimov if I can find the time. She's sailing through tables and shelves until then.

If you want to build a 1/700 Kirov class battlecruiser, Revell Germany has just released what I suspect is a rebox of this very kit. Dragon is doing a rebox of this kit as well - except they are including PE for the fine antennas, so I'd get that one.

In addition to just wanting to try out some new stuff, I got this kit because I've always found the Kirov class fascinating. I actually have some light infodumping prepared on this subject, so I'll be able to tell you why...